|
F
A Q
|
|
LINKS to other sites:
|
|
Finding your way around
The questions beneath the FAQ heading above link directly to
an
answer page on this site.
The blue underlined links below the questions and immediately above this box
link to selected external web sites.
Go to the Site Maps for an overview of the site structure.
|
|
|
|
|
How will e-learning affect my students?
"the views and experiences of the students
should be the ultimate indicator of success", Lazenby,
p.306.
They may have problems reaching a 'comfort
zone'
Comfort with a different way of communicating?
"Publishing a
message and knowing others read it, but don't comment is like
talking into a big empty space and being ignored!" (Student
message to an H802 conference).
- Students
"did not feel a concern about lack of
personal contact after five months of experience" of
the new approach at the University of Twente. Collis & De Boer
found in a pre-course survey that 20%
(N=45) of on-campus students and 23% (N=25) of off-campus
students were concerned about a possible lack of personal contact(p.356).
Five months later only 4.2%(N=25) of on-campus and 7.1% (N=15)
of off-campus students were similarly concerned. This
reduction possibly reflects the implementation strategy which was planned to emphasise the bond between student and
teacher. Although there were only eight lectures in four
months students were expected to spend the time between these
engaging in activities such as
submitting small assignments to a shared resource, contributing to
FAQs and commenting on model answers and on each other's work.
- But
"there are cultural differences in student
comfort expressing ideas on bulletin boards and via e-mail"
(Brown, p.375) While
some practitioners argue that asynchronous
conferencing can encourage shy students. others have found that
students are reluctant to expose their thoughts publicly and
prefer to lurk and learn by
reading what others have written rather than posting
contributions themselves. Initial ice-breaking activities
and exercises in Netiquette
and how to participate in an online discussion are recommended (Brown,
p.376) and Fisher points out that her students started to feel
more comfortable when they became aware that "someone was
there to help them get through the activities" (Fisher,
p.324).
"Good online teaching means person to person
interaction. Just like real life", (Azevedo,
1999) .
Comfort with a different way of learning?
"Top Class has been really an important and
helpful part of the course. It allowed us to share and discuss
our ideas and beliefs . . . we have learned a lot from each
other", (extract from student journal in Foley &
Schuck, p.129).
-
"instructors have observed that there has been strong
enthusiasm among the students who actively participated in
online learning" (Fisher, p.322). All the
Special Issue authors agree that a learner-centred approach
which focuses upon collaborative learning via computer
conferencing results in higher order learning as evidenced
by an increase in creative response, reflective thinking and
awareness of multiple perspectives. Models which
require students to submit electronic portfolios, mind maps,
group reports, etc., are found to be particularly useful (Bonk
& Dennen, p.408). The Special
Issue article 'Curriculum & Learning-Resources Issues
Arising from the Use of Web-Based Course Support Systems
suggests many ways of creating WWW-resources which encourage
co-operative tasks based on constructivist learning
principles (Oliver &
McLoughlin, pp.419-435) .
- But some students are less happy. Foley &
Schuck (1998), in their report on a study also discussed by Alexander,
found that 51 out of the 82 (62.2% students who responded to the
question about difficulty with collaboration reported some sort
of dissatisfaction with the process. "Group
assignments suck!" was one student's response (Foley &
Schuck, p.132 ). Authors suggest that students may need a
course on 'learning how to learn' to wean them from
passive teacher-led modes of instruction (Oliver & McLoughlin
p.424;) but also warn against a 'one size fits all'
mentality and suggest that not all students will want to learn
in the same way and should be provided with a variety of options
(Collis & De Boer p.353; Alexander,
p.290)
Comfort with the technology?
When I first attended the online class, I was
scared, since my level of knowledge and interest in the technology
is minimal. It was as if I was learning to drive a car: afraid
of an accident and getting lost . . . (Student quoted by Fisher,
p.325).
- Problems that students have with the technology are discussed
on the Technical Issues page and should
not be dismissed as trivial. Authors predict that this may
be a short-term problem that will disappear as the world becomes
more wired. At
the same time issues of the exclusion of students who have no
access to the technology because of disability or poverty
(personal or regional) should not be overlooked.
Or they may lead the way . . .
" . . . it is sometimes a wonder that
our students learn anything at all", Goodyear,
1998.
- Authors have noted that once students have experienced one
online course they demand that the facility be extended to
future courses they take (Lazenby
p.304-5, Fisher, p.314). ). This
has been experienced by the author of this web site and is likely to mean that teachers
who respond to their students' needs will be drawn into the
e-learning environment.
|